Platform
Method architecture for measurement and emissions engineering.
Every engagement — whether continuous emissions monitoring or gas custody transfer — is structured around the same core methodology: defined measurement basis, documented assumptions, reconciliation logic, and outputs designed for independent review.
This page describes that methodology. It is not a product feature list. It is the engineering discipline that underpins both service domains.
Four principles of structured measurement practice
These principles apply consistently across both service domains. They determine how measurement data is handled from instrument output to reported result.
Traceability
Every calculation step is documented. From raw instrument reading through unit conversion, averaging, quality flag application, and emission factor use — the path to the reported number is reproducible and reviewable. No black-box steps.
Reconciliation
Mass balance checks and consistency tests are built in. Deviations trigger documented exception handling — not silent substitution. For gas measurement: shore figure vs. ship figure. For CEMS: data availability percentage vs. regulatory threshold.
Assumption control
All assumptions — thermodynamic factors, emission factors, default values, substitution rules, composition proxies — are explicit, versioned, and change-controlled. When an assumption changes, its impact on historical results is traceable.
Audit readiness
Output packages are structured for external review from the start. Technical reviewers, regulatory inspectors, counterparties, and financial due diligence analysts should find complete, navigable documentation — not reconstructed summaries.
What the methodology produces
The method framework above generates specific, defined deliverables — not reports, but structured technical outputs.
Custody transfer packages
Quantity determination documents, mass balance reconciliation summaries, BOG calculations, and Shore/Ship Figure comparison reports — each with traceable calculation workbooks.
CEMS compliance records
Structured emissions datasets with quality flags, missing data logs, calibration event records, RATA/QAL2 test summaries, and data availability calculations per reporting period.
QA and calibration documentation
Calibration records traceable to certified reference materials, instrument drift logs, QAL3 control charts, and DAHS configuration documentation — maintained for the audit window required by the applicable framework.
Methodology statements
Documented calculation basis, assumption registers, and data flow descriptions sufficient for a technically qualified third party to independently verify results without access to the original software.
The value of measurement is determined by whether it can be trusted under scrutiny — not whether it produces convenient numbers.
When a regulatory inspector requests CEMS data, a counterparty disputes a custody transfer quantity, or a lender requires emissions evidence — the documentation either holds or it does not. FUTUREGAZ builds it to hold.